5 May
2010
5 May
'10
8:28 a.m.
Michael Saunders wrote:
Wolfgang Schuster: http://pragma-ade.com/general/manuals/cont-enp.pdf -> page 159
That rambling entry is like the webpage but worse. It still doesn't say what arguments 2--4 do, why \infull is necesarry, or anything else with any clarity. It's just another bundle of bad writing concealing what may be (but probably isn't) something useful.
plonk.