On 02/16/2018 11:57 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
you can look into the cache and see what names.tma mentions (and save the xits bit for later comparison when it fails)
as i can't replicate it here i need that info Hans,
I have compared the two files names.tma from my laptop (has the error) and my desktop (works); both run some form of x86_64 linux and have context minimals 2018.02.12. The only difference I could spot relating to xits was this: the working computer has these entries in the table ["otf"] = { ["xits"]=752, ["xitsbold"]=749, ["xitsbolditalic"]=750, ["xitsitalic"]=751, ["xitsmath"]=754, ["xitsmathbold"]=753, ["xitsmathregular"]=754, ["xitsregular"]=752, }, the not-working one only has: ["otf"] = { ["xits"]=749, ["xitsbold"]=744, ["xitsbolditalic"]=745, ["xitsitalic"]=746, ["xitsmath"]=747, ["xitsmathbold"]=748, }, so the entry for xitsmathregular is missing. But I have no idea if this is helpful for you. If you want, I can zip the two files and send them to you. All best Thomas