:-) yes, the autumn version allowed this :-) I do not need grouping for this simple case, this is only an extracted minimal example. The real situation occurs in relative complex table typeset automatically from CSV -- CSV content is loaded, parsed, recomputed, stored into some toks and reused/typeset more times. As I remember the grouping causing error in my case is \startcolor[] \stopcolor. Now I dig into problem and I'll send you more info (I forgot the cause :-) Thanks, Martin
-----Original Message----- From: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl [mailto:ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl]On Behalf Of Hans Hagen Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 12:46 PM To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Subject: RE: [NTG-context] problem with tables
At 12:37 PM 3/12/2003 +0100, you wrote:
Sure,
but this? (I've added grouping, it must be present to get error)
\setupTABLE[c][1][aligncharacter=yes]
\bTABLE \bTR \bTD \bgroup 123,0 \egroup \eTD \eTR \bTR \bTD 13,0 \eTD \eTR \bTR \bTD 3,0 \eTD \eTR \eTABLE
hm, why do you need the grouping? The string is parsed, so grouping like this will spoil thing s
Hans
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | pragma@wxs.nl Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- information: http://www.pragma-ade.com/roadmap.pdf documentation: http://www.pragma-ade.com/showcase.pdf -------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context