On 15-12-2010 6:11, Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o. wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:06:42 +0100, Hans Hagen
wrote: actually, the luacode was doing the right thing as there is a protect/unprotect mismatch (will be fixed); puttingthis at the top of you file works:
\catcodetable\ctxcatcodes
thank you, Hans.
This makes both solutions (Ctx generated and Lua generated) equal - [wider] spacing is the same.
Just my point of view - the previous native Ctx result (= narrower spacing in subscript when mixing upper and lower case letters) - seemed to me a bit prettier; wouldn't be better to keep the "old" Ctx look (= result without \catcodetable\ctxcatcodes) and to drive Lua to give the same result?
no, the question is why the spacing in math is there, the catcode regime should indeed be ctxcatcodes ... more something for aditya to figure out Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------