On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 15:06, Paul Menzel wrote:
Dear ConTeXt folks,
using
ConTeXt ver: 2011.05.18 22:26 MKIV fmt: 2011.5.27 int: english/english
the following example produces different integral signs.
--- minimal example --- \starttext Using the NEO keyboard layout several math symbols can be inserted directly like $∫$ or $∩$.
But $\int$ and $∫$ look differently. \stoptext --- minimal example ---
However the character ∫ looks the same as \intop and ∫\nolimits looks the same as \int. As to why \intop looks so weird, I have no idea. If you add \usetypescript[modern-base] \setupbodyfont[modern] it will work ok. Cambria Math also results in two different heights of the operator depending on whether limits are there or not. It might be a bug somewhere in virtual font setup of LM. In pdfTeX \int and \intop operators are positioned equally. Mojca