Re: [NTG-context] MathPazo & Palatino

On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Pepe Barbe wrote:

On 9/6/06, Steve Grathwohl wrote:

...

That must be some heavy maths if Palatino out of the box can't do it. It makes use of the pxfonts set for math which is very complete, including everything the amsfonts contain and more besides. Certainly more complete than MathPazo IIRC.

They are not that complicated but I need to use Bold a lot for Matrices and Vectors. AFAIK, and in my experiments not all glyphs worked as bold when doing math. I don't know if I am calling palatino correctly or what. I understood that I could get bold through MathPazo.

How do you call bold? ConTeXt's inbuilt support for bold math does not work in all situations. Check the wiki for a \hbox workaround and see if that helps. Aditya