24 Oct
2002
24 Oct
'02
4:48 p.m.
Giuseppe Bilotta writes:
Tuesday, October 22, 2002 Hans Hagen wrote:
HH> tex -> fmt HH> etec -> efmt (already) HH> pdftex -> pft HH> pdfetex -> epmt HH> omega -> oft HH> eomega -> eoft HH> nts -> nfmt (already)
HH> but since pdftex is compatible is less urgent
since it's efmt and nfmt, wouldn't consistency call for pfmt, ofmt, eofmt, pefmt ?
Yes, but thanks to the immense success of 8+3 filenames, they could end up being truncated to pfm, ofm, eof, pef respectively. ofm is known to collide with another suffix. -- Olaf Weber (This space left blank for technical reasons.)