![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/7698ca8517c6b0d840c3eb065bceca3d.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
3 Dec
2002
3 Dec
'02
9:03 p.m.
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 10:57:19PM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
At 09:16 PM 12/2/2002 +0100, you wrote:
actually, utf maps onto context internal named glyphs
I had a brief look into xtag-utf, and the xtag-me? and xtag-mx? modules. I totally understimated how much you have already done in this area. How does one get an internal name for say a Devanagari symbol? It should somehow refer to a font or a font encoding that contains such a symbol. Should the font encoding define such internal names, and map them to the glyph indices in the font? In another mail you refer to Chinese and korean support; where can that be seen? Regards, Simon -- Simon Pepping email: spepping@scaprea.hobby.nl