Sebastian Sturm wrote:
Hi all,
I have been playing around a bit with the new ConTeXt Minimals and especially Cambria Math. I couldn't figure out, however, why the integral operator always comes out at about half the size of \sum or \prod. I couldn't find any relevant threads on the mailing list, but surely this is not the way it's supposed to be?
No, that is clearly not right. I will investigate and report back. On the \widehat: it scales as far as the font allows it to. If that is not wide enough, I guess you could send a bug report to Microsoft.
Is there some list on the web showing what parts of math have been implemented, what still needs to be done (and, where someone with limited TeX knowledge could provide some assistance)?
No, not on the web. But there are only a few known MATH issues in the core/mkiv that I know of: * Latin Modern Math (and other old math font) virtual definitions are far from perfect (but that should not affect you, as you are using CambriaMath). * There is no support for skewed (text-style, with a diagonal bar, like in the frac feature) fractions yet in luatex. * The traditional TeX commands \atopwithdelims, \overwithdelims, and \abovewithdelims do not work properly because there is no matching MATH parameter at all. The real problem though, is that we do not have massive math tests: neither Hans nor me do any math typesetting in daily practise. Best wishes, Taco