Marcin Borkowski wrote:
However, I tried \startitemize[1] and it didn't work (neither at my computer nor in online ConTeXt, with the example I have provided on my user page).
[n=1]
Please do not think that I am angry at you, Hans, or anything like that; I really admire your (and not only your) work with ConTeXt. But I am a bit disappointed - and hope that itemizations will eventually work. And now I guess I'll have to work this around in some nasty way (most probably, I'll just do the only one-column itemization by hand).
well, although tex can do a lot, there are limitations; column related stuff for instance is a matter of programming all possible aspects of it; and there can be conflicting demands
And you may be pretty sure that I will be a good beta-tester for the itemization stuff - as I already told, I use itemizations a lot, together with math, nesting itemizations, two-column ones etc. For the purpose of testing any new things in this area I'm leaving the examples on my user page, too.
ok; but as mentioned before only mkiv will have improved itemizations
PS. Looking back at the steady progress of ConTeXt & luatex, I am pretty sure that this _will_ be solved in finite time anyway, so I can just \relax, wait and then test and provide feedback;).
thanks Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------