Re: [NTG-context] Bug: Messy results when using "table" in head and multi-page "tables" in text

20 Jan 2008

      Dear Wolfgang,

I tried that too already, but unfortunately I run into the same problem:
That is, if I use the natural tables in the header, I can't use them  
for multi-page tables in the text, as again the results ain't pretty,  
to say the least.

Here the ConTeXt to show what happens in that case
(and using your suggestion for the page-head with natural tables)

\setuppagenumbering[location=]
\setupheadertexts[\setups{pagehead}][][\setups{pagehead}][]
\startsetups[pagehead]
\bTABLE[option=stretch,strut=no,offset=.5em]
  \bTR
    \bTD[align={right,lohi},width=4cm] left \eTD
    \bTD[align={middle,lohi},width=6cm] middle \eTD
    \bTD[align={left,lohi},width=4cm] right \eTD
  \eTR
\eTABLE
\stopsetups

\starttext

\bTABLE[split=repeat,option=stretch,strut=no,offset=.5em]
\bTABLEhead[rulethickness=1pt]
   \bTR
      \bTH[align={middle,lohi},width=6cm] head \eTH
   \eTR
\eTABLEhead
\bTABLEbody%
%\dorecurse{1}{	% works
\dorecurse{10}{	% works NOT
   \bTR
     \bTD
	{\input knuth \par}
     \eTD
   \eTR
}
\eTABLEbody
\bTABLEfoot
   \bTR
     \bTH footer  \eTH
   \eTR
\eTABLEfoot
\eTABLE

\stoptext

The thing is, I rather tell the users of this page-layout NOT to use  
the \starttables ... \stoptables for multi-page tables, but rely on  
the natural tables for those (which work nicely, even though I  
_really_ would like to have a dedicated footer for each page here and  
not just one for the last page! Which by the way is something one  
doesn't need a dedicated command for, as one could _always_ just place  
that part at the end of the body part, as that will be then at the end  
of the table, i.e. the right place, no matter how many pages the table  
has.)
However, given, that \starttables ... \stoptables doesn't give me the  
correct footer in my case anyway, I rather have one type of table that  
is quite a bit easier for me and my colleagues to use and adapt for  
the multi-page tables, i.e. the 'natural' ones, and therefore keep  
using table in the header.

But yes, thanks for the suggestion, unfortunately, TABLE seems to rely  
on the same sort of buffer / storage / whatever mechanism, to do it's  
multi-page magic....

And that just doesn't work with having the same table-type in the  
header, too.
(This is probably also true in case of the footer...)

Overall, things do work, as long as one does use the other type of  
table or tables / TABLE in either header or text, but it works NOT  
when you use the same in both...

Not quite sure, what's the reason for that or (and more importantly)  
what can be done about it

With best regards
Carsten

P.S.: What is interesting is that on the last pages of a multi-page  
table things do become sorted out again in either case and everything  
looks more or less as it should (i.e. like in the single-page table)

Am 20.01.2008 um 14:10 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
...
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:37:13 +0100
Carsten Fechtmann  wrote:
...
Dear ConTeXt experts,
I have setup a page layout where I use "table" in the page-head for
formatting quite a bit of stuff. (The example below is just a simple
as can be basic idea, to show the overall effect)
Now - as I can't prevent later users of this layout environment - to
not use \starttables ... \stoptables I naturally would like for this
to work in the text region as well.
This works fine and as advertised (well mostly, see below) as long as
the table does not spill over to the next page. In which case, things
start to look very messy, indeed.
From my (simple) point of view it looks like ConTeXt gets confused
about which format to use for which table and tries to do them all at
the same place or something.
Any chance to get this fixed ?
Use the following setup for the header, it use natural tables.
\startsetups pagehead
\bTABLE[option=stretch,strut=no,offset=.5em]
 \bTR
   \bTD[align={right,lohi},width=4cm] left \eTD
   \bTD[align={middle,lohi},width=6cm] middle \eTD
   \bTD[align={left,lohi},width=4cm] right \eTD
 \eTR
\eTABLE
\stopsetups
...
Thanks in advance
Carsten
P.S.: There is an additional bug (also concerning the single page
version and not related to having a "table" in the pagehead), which
puts in an extra (empty) gap in between the end of the tablebody and
the tablefoot when the tablefoot starts with \HL (and there is no \HL
at the end of tablebody).
Things work when putting the \HL at the end of the tablebody, but  
then
no \HL will be put on top of the foot for any intermediate pages of
the table, which is certainly not what one would usually want in this
case.
I have no solution for this.
...
Anyway, here a simple version of this to demonstrate the effect(s)
\setuppagenumbering[location=]
\setupheadertexts[\setups{pagehead}][][\setups{pagehead}][]
\startsetups[pagehead]
\SetTableToWidth{\makeupwidth}
\starttable[|p(40mm)|p(60mm)|p(40mm)|]
\HL
\VL \leftaligned{left} \VL \midaligned{middle} \VL
\rightaligned{right} \VL\SR
\HL
\stoptable
\stopsetups
\starttext
\start
\SetTableToWidth{\makeupwidth}
\setuptables[split=repeat]
\starttablehead
\HL
\VL Head \VL\SR
\HL
\stoptablehead
\starttabletail
\HL	% This results in an additional bug,
  % i.e. an extra / unwanted gap
\VL   Foot \VL\SR
\HL
\stoptabletail
\starttables[|p(.95\textwidth)|]
\VL \input knuth \VL\FR
%\dorecurse{1}{\VL \input tufte \VL\MR}
\dorecurse{10}{\VL \input tufte \VL\MR}
\VL \input knuth \VL\LR
% \HL 	% putting \HL here does not introduce
  % that unwanted gap ...?!?
\stoptables
\stop
\stoptext
Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an  
entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________