![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/e79f226aa442b589932230491affa641.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Am 30.09.2010 um 20:42 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
Am 30.09.2010 um 20:31 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
\definestructureconversionset[footnote][number,characters][numbers] \setupenumerations[footnote][numberconversionset=footnote]
Again, not yet!
Please run the test file: now we have "2.a" ... instead of "2a".
\definestructureseparatorset [footnote][][] \definestructureconversionset[footnote][number,characters][numbers] \setupenumerations[footnote][numberconversionset=footnote,numberseparatorset=footnote]
Wow, it's really needs a lot to change the outfit of one tiny subfoonote ;o)
@Hans Can you make synonyms of the \define... commands without the “structure” in the name!
+1 I assumed that "\definestructurefoo" is always related to structure, meaning structure of document, sections ... not the formatting of footnotes. Next time I know better: it's all about enumeration, it's all about structure today. Thank you very much! Steffen