![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/49e63acb01f2ca80efce7eed08310ce8.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On 9/18/2014 12:06 AM, Mark Szepieniec wrote:
Bump...
If it's not too much trouble, I would greatly appreciate some feedback on this before I propose it to be merged into pandoc; even a "looks good to me" from one of the ConTeXt gurus would be very helpful.
Thanks in advance,
Mark
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Mark Szepieniec
mailto:mszepien@gmail.com> wrote: I'm trying to fix a problem in pandoc (see https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/pull/1589) where it doesn't properly sanitize the reference labels in ConTeXt output, causing errors during compilation when a label contains '#' for example. Note that this sanitizing is needed in addition to the regular backslash escaping used for control characters: '\#' is still illegal in a label for example.
In the sanitizer function I'm writing, I'd like to properly escape all illegal characters, but I couldn't find an explicit list of allowed or illegal characters. Based on some testing I've conducted (see attached file), I've arrived at the following set:
\#[]",{}%()|=
it depends on where these characters end up in # : always tricky as it denotes an argument, so escape [] : depends if it gets fed into a macro that uses [] as delimiters {} : only an issue when not balanced % : escaping needed as it's comment otherwise () : depends on where it ends up, like [] | : is special in context so needs escaping \ : of course that one needs escaping
1) Does this look like a reasonable set? Are there other characters or sequences that should be included, or are worth testing?
keep in mind that escapes should end up unescaped at some point
2) I was told (see https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/pandoc-discuss/tYpXMUkmbEY) that if the characters " and , didn't work, it would count as a ConTeXt bug, is there any truth to that? Please let me know if any further info is needed on my part.
well, define bug ... one can say the same of < and > in xml -) if the result ends up in a comma separated list then , can be an issue but one can always wrap an argument in {} to hide that
3) Does anyone see issues with this general approach? I'm relatively new to ConTeXt, so I might be missing either a huge problem, or an obviously easier way to do this.
i don't know ... i never used pandoc input Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------