I have an article with a lot of footnotes to be set at the end of the document. \setupfootnotes[location=text] and \placefootnotes Works except that the notes don't get broken across pages. See how the footnotes just go down and off the end of the page. ConTeXt ver: 2002.10.23 %snip --------- \setuppapersize [A5][A4] \setuplayout [location=middle,marking=on] \setupfootnotes[location=text] \starttext As one who does mostly publications which have tables, I am unimpressed by the implementations in both QXP and InDesign. However, if I my only options were to choose\footnote{This is a footnote.} between QXP5 and InDesign to implement tables, InDesign is the hands-down winner. InDesign also has layers, and while I can't compare them to QXP5's implementation, I do like the fact that InDesign's layers are implemented in the same way as the other Adobe applications. As one who does mostly publications which have tables, I am unimpressed by the implementations\footnote{This is a silly footnote.} in both QXP and InDesign. However, if I my only options were to choose between QXP5 and InDesign to implement tables, InDesign is the hands-down winner. InDesign also has layers, and while I can't compare them to QXP5's implementation, I do like the fact that InDesign's layers are implemented in the same way as the other Adobe applications.\footnote{As one who does mostly publications which have tables, I am unimpressed by the implementations in both QXP and InDesign. However, if I my only options were to choose between QXP5 and InDesign to implement tables, InDesign is the hands-down winner. InDesign also has layers, and while I can't compare them to QXP5's implementation, I do like the fact that InDesign's layers are implemented in the same way as the other Adobe applications.} As one who does mostly\footnote{This is another silly footnote.} publications which have tables, I am unimpressed by the implementations in both QXP and InDesign. However, if I my only options were to choose between QXP5 and InDesign to implement tables, InDesign is the hands-down winner. InDesign also has layers, and while I can't compare them to QXP5's implementation, I do like the fact that InDesign's layers are implemented in the same way as the other Adobe applications. As one who does mostly publications\footnote{This is a very silly footnote.} which have tables, I am unimpressed by the implementations in both QXP and InDesign. However, if I my only options were to choose between QXP5 and InDesign to implement tables, InDesign is the hands-down winner. InDesign also has layers, and while I can't compare them to QXP5's implementation, I do like the fact that InDesign's layers are implemented in the same way as the other Adobe applications.\footnote{See Baker, S. 50.} As one who does mostly publications which have tables, I am unimpressed by the implementations in both QXP\footnote{This is a silly footnote.} and InDesign. However, if I my only options were to choose between QXP5 and InDesign to implement tables, InDesign is the hands-down winner.\footnote{As one who does mostly publications which have tables, I am unimpressed by the implementations in both QXP and InDesign. However, if I my only options were to choose between QXP5 and InDesign to implement tables, InDesign is the hands-down winner. InDesign also has layers, and while I can't compare them to QXP5's implementation, I do like the fact that InDesign's layers are implemented in the same way as the other Adobe applications.} InDesign also has layers, and while I can't compare them to QXP5's implementation, I do like the fact that InDesign's layers are implemented in the same way as the other Adobe applications.As one who does mostly publications which have tables, I am unimpressed by the implementations in both QXP and InDesign. However, if I my only options were to choose between QXP5 and InDesign to implement tables, InDesign is the hands-down winner. InDesign also has layers, and while I can't compare them to QXP5's implementation, I do like the fact that InDesign's layers are implemented in the same way as the other Adobe applications.\footnote{As one who does mostly publications which have tables, I am unimpressed by the implementations in both QXP and InDesign. However, if I my only options were to choose between QXP5 and InDesign to implement tables, InDesign is the hands-down winner. InDesign also has layers, and while I can't compare them to QXP5's implementation, I do like the fact that InDesign's layers are implemented in the same way as the other Adobe applications.} As one who does mostly publications which have tables, I am unimpressed by the implementations in both QXP and InDesign. However, if I my only options were to choose between QXP5 and InDesign to implement tables, InDesign\footnote{As one who does mostly publications which have tables, I am unimpressed by the implementations in both QXP and InDesign. However, if I my only options were to choose between QXP5 and InDesign to implement tables, InDesign is the hands-down winner. InDesign also has layers, and while I can't compare them to QXP5's implementation, I do like the fact that InDesign's layers are implemented in the same way as the other Adobe applications.} is the hands-down \footnote{This is a silly footnote.}winner. InDesign also has layers, and while I can't compare them to QXP5's implementation, I do like the fact that InDesign's layers are implemented in the same way as the other Adobe\footnote{See website at adobe.com.} applications.\footnote{As one who does mostly publications which have tables, I am unimpressed by the implementations in both QXP and InDesign. However, if I my only options were to choose between QXP5 and InDesign to implement tables, InDesign is the hands-down winner. InDesign also has layers, and while I can't compare them to QXP5's implementation, I do like the fact that InDesign's layers are implemented in the same way as the other Adobe applications.} As one who does\footnote{As one who does mostly publications which have tables, I am unimpressed by the implementations in both QXP and InDesign. However, if I my only options were to choose between QXP5 and InDesign to implement tables, InDesign is the hands-down winner. InDesign also has layers, and while I can't compare them to QXP5's implementation, I do like the fact that InDesign's layers are implemented in the same way as the other Adobe applications.} mostly publications which have tables, I am unimpressed by the implementations\footnote{This is a silly footnote.} in both QXP and InDesign. However, if I my only options were to choose between QXP5 and InDesign to implement tables, InDesign is the hands-down winner. InDesign also has layers, and while I can't compare them to QXP5's implementation, I do like the fact that InDesign's layers are implemented in the same way as the other Adobe applications. \blank \placefootnotes \stoptext