Would it be a good idea to add to the definition of \noheaderandfooterlines?
For example
\def\noheaderandfooterlines{..}
% Separately kill header and footerlines on the current page.
\def\noheaderlines{\setuplayoutelement[header][state=empty]}
\def\nofooterlines{\setuplayoutelement[footer][state=empty]}
I added these to my macroset, because I find \noheaderlines easier to remember than \setuplayoutelement[header][state=empty].
Hans van der Meer
On 20 Jul 2014, at 22:20, Wolfgang Schuster mailto:schuster.wolfgang@gmail.com> wrote:
Am 20.07.2014 um 22:02 schrieb Meer, H. van der mailto:H.vanderMeer@uva.nl>:
On 20 Jul 2014, at 21:51, Wolfgang Schuster mailto:schuster.wolfgang@gmail.com> wrote:
Am 20.07.2014 um 21:35 schrieb Meer, H. van der mailto:H.vanderMeer@uva.nl>:
Thanks. Please let us know if this addition of location=none will be taken up in a future beta.
I also realised that the effect wanted can be obtained by dividing the single
\noheaderandfooterlines
into two additional macros
\noheaderlines and \nofooterlines
Is that a viable idea too?
When you want disable only one element you can use the \setupheader or \setupfooter command.
I guess no. That was just the thing that did not worked out, because the \noheaderandfooterlines did the effect of the \setupheader vanish.
What \noheaderandfooterlines does is to call the following two setups:
- \setupheader[state=empty] and
- \setupfooter[state=empty]
Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nlmailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nlhttp://www.pragma-ade.nl/ / http://tex.aanhet.nethttp://tex.aanhet.net/
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.nethttp://contextgarden.net/
___________________________________________________________________________________
