13 Sep
2012
13 Sep
'12
9:59 a.m.
Hi Aditya,
Yes it is a strange behaviour and it appears only when using mkiv and reversed itemize, even with
\setuppagenumber[start=12]
instead of
\setupuserpagenumber[start=12]
Also the pagenumber remains unchanged with either of these commands, which means that it's a bug.
I tested your example with Context version 2011.11.29, mkiv and there everything is correct.
Best regards: OK
On 13 sept. 2012, at 02:34, Aditya Mahajan
Hi,
For some reason, the numbering in itemize is affected by the value of userpage!
\setupuserpagenumber[start=12] \starttext \startitemize[n,reverse] \item One \item Two \stopitemize \stoptext
With ConTeXt 2012.09.11 20:36 I get
13. One 12. Two
Any ideas?
Aditya