![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/60f3cc97f94fa3690ba406f8c1a7fc4f.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
The existing definition of \pmatrix in math-pln.mkiv is the original Plain TeX definition, because in the very early days ConTeXt used to be compatible with Plain. This tradition has prevailed until today. You will find other remnants of Plain TeX in ConTeXt, e.g. \eqalign, but it is better not to use them. Just like Plain TeX, ConTeXt does not provide \bmatrix and \vmatrix. One reason is that they didn't exist in Plain, but another important reason is that Hans is not a mathematician. If I remember correctly ConTeXt was originally developed for typesetting of primary school textbooks and last I checked matrix algebra was not part of the curriculum. Other developers (Alan, Aditya, and others) have contributed math typesetting macros over time, but these follow the ConTeXt philosophy of providing strong defaults but trying to avoid feature creep. Therefore bmatrix, vmatrix, etc. are not defined by default, but as you saw from my last message it is trivial to define these, especially because templates (matrix:parentheses, etc.) for them already exist in the core. It would sometimes be nice if you could just copy and paste LaTeX code into a ConTeXt document and it just works™, but after all ConTeXt is not LaTeX. Cheers, Henri On 4/07/19 5:18 PM, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
Hi Henri, Thanks for your suggestions, they are very instructive. However, my request is not a smart way of displaying matrices but to know why \bmatrix and \vmatrix are not provided in core part of ConTeXt although \pmatrix is provided already in math-pln.mkiv
About matrices, I first found commands in your first email in http://dl.contextgarden.net/myway/context-latex-math.pdf (like \startpmatrix \NC A\NC B\NR \NC C\NC D\NR\stoppmatrix) and then browsing ma-cb-en.pdf I noticed another command like \pmatrix{A&B\cr C&D\cr}. Now by your email, I know a command \pmatrix{A, B; C, D}
One might say ConTeXt is flexible but I've an impression that ConTeXt is in a state of confusion/disorder.
I think it is better if a standard command is provided by core ConTeXt or by a module etc.
Or is it ConTeXt way that each user defines his/her own commands in setup area and uses them in text area? I'm afraid consistency and/or portability is lost in such scenario.
BTW, I constantly convert Beamer documents into ConTeXt's simpleslide documents recently and it is very convenient if I can use \pmatrix{a&b\cr c&d\cr} style because it is similar to LaTeX documents.
2019年7月3日(水) 15:42 Henri Menke
: On 3/07/19 6:00 PM, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
I've used LaTeX quite a long time but recently I begin to use ConTeXt too. So I'm very sorry if the following is well-known issue.
I find an example of \pmatrix in p.21 of "ConTeXt Mark IV an excursion" (ma-cb-en.pdf). And I notice it is defined in /usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/mkiv/math-pln.mkiv (in Debian). But it seems \bmatrix, \vmatrix are not defined yet. Is there any reason why they are not defined? Similar commands or environments \begin{bmatrix}...\end{bmatrix}, \begin{vmatrix}...\end{vmatrix} are very often used in mathematical LaTeX documents. It is very useful if we can use \bmatrix and \vmatrix in ConTeXt documents, so please add \unexpanded\def\bmatrix#1% {\left[\matrix{#1}\right]} \unexpanded\def\vmatrix#1% {\left|\matrix{#1}\right|} in math-pln.mkiv or somewhere.
Ignore my other message, this is even better:
\definemathmatrix [pmatrix] [matrix:parentheses] [simplecommand=pmatrix]
\definemathmatrix [bmatrix] [matrix:brackets] [simplecommand=bmatrix]
\definemathmatrix [vmatrix] [matrix:bars] [simplecommand=vmatrix]
\definemathmatrix [Vmatrix] [left={\left\lVert\mskip\thinmuskip}, right={\mskip\thinmuskip\right\rVert}, align=middle, simplecommand=Vmatrix]
\starttext
\startformula \startpmatrix \NC A \NC B \NR \NC C \NC D \NR \stoppmatrix \quad \startbmatrix \NC A \NC B \NR \NC C \NC D \NR \stopbmatrix \quad \startvmatrix \NC A \NC B \NR \NC C \NC D \NR \stopvmatrix \quad \startVmatrix \NC A \NC B \NR \NC C \NC D \NR \stopVmatrix \stopformula
\startformula \pmatrix{A, B; C, D} \quad \bmatrix{A, B; C, D} \quad \vmatrix{A, B; C, D} \quad \Vmatrix{A, B; C, D} \stopformula
\stoptext
By the way, I think it is critical to set \setupmathematics[ampersand=normal] to use \matrix above but I can't find this setting in ma-cb-en.pdf It is great if this is added in ma-cb-en.pdf
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________