![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/6114858d84b0f40cf715f12237ab67a1.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 06/22/2014 10:40 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
[...] How about increasing the timeout to 600 seconds?
We can, but then at least we need to make a rough calculation of what transfer speed should still be supported. And no matter what value we use, it will break for people (I also get a lot of "memory limit exceeded" warnings in the logs, without even having any significant number of users). The repository is currently a bit below 100 MiB.
And if I put a complete distribution into the repository as intended, we could probably set the time limit to a few days ;)
GitHub is then fine.
No, it's not. They'll kick us out once we start putting gigabytes of binaries on their site.
And maybe create a project at GitHub, but "context" is already taken.
Also contextgarden is already taken at GitHub.
Indeed.
Sorry, I overlooked that this was ConTeXt.
You couldn't have know it. I have put the repository there after you asked. And there was not any description there earlier.
context is taken at Bitbucket, but not contexgarden. How about Bitbucket?
I need to make an account first.
Well, my previous question doesn’t make sense, if GitHub has a ConTeXt repo.
It still does if some users are addicts of BitBucket ;) In any case it would make sense to update the repository on Gitorious at some point. Mojca