On 5/11/22 11:47, Denis Maier via ntg-context wrote:
Hi everyone,
the wikipage on \starttyping
(https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Command/_starttyping
https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Command/_starttyping) says there are
some dedicated commands, e.g. \startXML and \startPARSEDXML. How do they
differ?
Hi Denis,
yesterday I had to start using xml instead of parsed-xml.
See the difference:
\setuppapersize[A4, landscape]
\setupbodyfont[dejavu]
\starttext
\startxtable[option=stretch]
\startxrow[offset=1ex]
\startxcell
\startXML
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xml>
<documento xml:lang="es">
Anuncio
<p xml:lang="grc">καλά</p>
<p class="traducción">Belleza</p>
</documento>
</xml>
\stopXML
\stopxcell
\startxcell
\startPARSEDXML
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xml>
<documento xml:lang="es">
Anuncio
<p xml:lang="grc">καλά</p>
<p class="traducción">Belleza</p>
</documento>
</xml>
\stopPARSEDXML
\stopxcell
\stopxrow
\stopxtable
\stoptext
I wonder why attribute values are parsed so. I don’t know whether this
might be a bug (but this is why I replaced "parsed-xml" with "xml" in my
code).
If I could ask you a favor, would you be so kind to confirm whether
\xmlpos and \xmldepth are misbehaving or not (as already reported in
https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2022/105495.html and
https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2022/105604.html)?
Many thanks for your help,
Pablo
