![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/e5aa6984b53b8925e405ebbdbc051ad9.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Am 17.11.2021 um 16:08 schrieb Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد <Idris.Hamid@colostate.edu>:
That looks to me like flawed logic – why should content for the unabridged version appear within the abridged version?
TeX comments will illustrate:
============== This text goes into the abridged version.
% This text will appear in the unabridged version.
And this text goes into the abridged version.
% And this text goes into the unabridged version.
And this additional text goes into the abridged version.
% And this additional text goes into the unabridged version. ==============
An abridged run will ignore the commented text, and an unabridged run will include it.
Ok, it it’s about such small snippets, consider \doifmode{mode1,mode2}{Conditional text}. I don’t think you would get shorter markup with nesting. More possibilities see https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Modes
Consider variant texts:
======= Here is some text that contains % mode=variantone includes % mode=varianttwo is comprised of % mode=variantthree some variants.
Here is some more text that features % mode=variantone exhibits % mode=varianttwo illustrates % mode=variantthree some variants. =======
This example is to be processed to produce exactly three distinct results. So, e.g., "contains" and "features" belong to variantone. Etc. So like XML.
How about: Here is some text that \startmodeset [variantone] {contains} [varianttwo] {includes} [variantthree] {is comprised of} [default] {doesn’t contain} \stopmodeset some variants.
It might be a bit annoying, but you could end the previous mode before starting the next. Assuming that I'm not misunderstanding you: For a book-length project, that would be beyond annoying.
Well, it looks like you’ll need a lot of markup anyway. HTH Hraban