The Google Docs version -- https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0BxWgi9nKtBIUNGNmYWM3ZDgtMjUwYy00YjZkLWExZWQtNDY1MDZmMTQ3MGI3&hl=en -- does not look like ConTeXt. But I think this is not the typeset and published version. I suppose by the "Satz:" entry on p. 5, the Wikipedia author guessed that it was typeset in ConTeXt. And yes, it will definitely bring some attention to ConTeXt. When you look at "Links auf diese Seite" (i.e. "What links here"), the article on the dissertation is the first untypical / unexpected link: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spezial:Linkliste/ConTeXt Johannes On 02/21/2011 06:43 PM, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
Did anyone on this list know (or did anyone notice yet) that the print version of the much-discussed dissertation by Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg was (allegedly) typeset in ConTeXt?
From my German colleague: "We should test if he masters ConTeXt. If he doesn't..."
Arthur
P-S: Whether that particular piece of information is true or not, it will bring some attention to ConTeXt! The ConTeXt community should try and take advantage of that :-) I wonder how the author of the Wikipedia article knows that, though. Presumably, someone got hold of a PDF version of the dissertation? ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
-- Johannes Kuester typoma mailto:jk@typoma.com http://www.typoma.com