![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/49e63acb01f2ca80efce7eed08310ce8.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hi, The beta has a bit adapted note interactivity (rather tricky as these inserts have their own weirdness) % \setupnotes[interaction=no] % \setupnotes[interaction=yes] % \setupnotes[interaction=text] % \setupnotes[interaction=number] \setupnotes[interaction=all] \setupinteraction[state=start,focus=width,option=name] % option probably not needed \starttext \dorecurse{10}{note #1\footnote[reference:#1]{\input ward \input tufte\relax} } \par \goto{OEPS 3}[reference:3] \goto{OEPS 10}[reference:10] \stoptext I can't check much (as I don't know what to expect, but there is no real definition of qualitative behaviour there anyway) but this is what can be done. I have no clue to what extent complex interactions between footnote splitting and their content can interfere. Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------