![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/435ac0d0ecd67394ae88a2020214d815.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hi, Hans
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Hans Hagen
Yue Wang wrote:
I see, no font is defined when dumping the formats... pretty unlike plain TeX... then why so much time is used for iwona, while only 1.2 sec is used to load lm roman?
see previous mail ... because xetex rebuilds the fc cache each time; so it's not related to context as all name lookups suffer from the same
then if it tries to load lm, it will build fc cache too, why is the loading time too short? in short, can you please explain to us why %engine=xetex \usetypescript[modern] [ec] \switchtobodyfont[modern, 10pt] \starttext \input zapf \stoptext uses TeXExec | runtime: 1.577 while %engine=xetex \usetypescript[palatino] [ec] \switchtobodyfont[palatino, 10pt] \starttext \input zapf \stoptext uses TeXExec | runtime: 6.469 (most time) and even sometime uses TeXExec | runtime: 40.806 (disk is busy, maybe due to font caching ...) what's the difference between lm and palatino? (I think lm contains more fonts.....) Yue Wang
Hans
----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________