On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 08:28:14 -0500 Jan Hlavacek jhlavacek@sf.edu wrote:
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 11:03:48AM +0100, Jens-Uwe Morawski wrote:
On Fri, 08 Nov 2002 09:30:56 +0100 Hans Hagen pragma@wxs.nl wrote:
At 09:36 PM 11/7/2002 +0100, Jens-Uwe Morawski wrote:
gnome-terminal: 2 min 18 sec konsole (KDE-terminal): 1 min 30 sec xterm: 1 min 5 sec directly on the console (no X-Windows): 58 sec
Don't ask me for reasons, but if your ConTeXt is too slow, ask yourself if you run it on the right terminal -)
maybe no ls-R file is found and consulted, resulting in a full scan of the texmf file structure.
No, no. TeX finds its files very fast. I could improve that with a smaller texmf-tree, but 1+ min for the job is IMO okay; it runs 3xConTeXt, 2xTeXUtil and 2xMetaPost. The problem is the terminal program. It seems that the drawing of those many messages on the terminal needs much time. If i use a slow terminal, i.e. gnome-terminal, then the runtime increases.
Did you try to run context with output redirected to a file? How long does that take?
try texexec yourfile.tex > logfile
ahh, interesting idea. Now it is independent from the used terminal and a run needs about 50 seconds.
Jens