On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 21:10, Vnpenguin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 19:59, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Apparently it means that CentOS uses something like a several-years-span-back-in-time libc library and you cannot do much about it. That's no problem in general since you would not take a suse-compiled firefox and take the binary to your CentOS.
Hey, CentOS 5.4 just released on 21-Oct-2009 :-) If I have problem with ConTeXt on CentOS 5.4 so all users of RHEL 5.4 are the same: they can not!
Yes, I have noticed. People often reply to come to mailing list saying "I have installed the brand new Ubuntu" and yet they have something like 4-year-old ConTeXt. This is nothing bad. It's just a bad luck in this particular case, but we'll solve it.
c) you would need to compile the binaries for minimals on regular basis
Howto do this ? Is there any guide ?
Not really. Just the first line of http://wiki.contextgarden.net/ConTeXt_Minimals/Implementation that says svn co http://svn.contextgarden.net/minimals-src/build-binaries and then you need to run the script build-binaries (but it will fail since you don't have the rights yet). You may try to run ./update-binaries.sh first and then compile pdftex to start with (it returns warnings, but feel free to ignore them; the binary should nevertheless be there). We can create you an account, but we need to talk first just to agree on the building schedule.
If it's not possible with ConTeXt minimal distro, maybe I'll go for TeXlive.
Are you planning to use MKII (pdftex) or MKIV (unicode and opentype fonts with luatex)? In TeX Live the MKIV support is hardly usable, but feel free to go testing TeX Live. You may install TL 2009 in a really minimalistic way. (Almost the same size as minimals, and in completely isolated folder.) Mojca