![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/abcf726e8937bab9f50babda19270124.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hi, I love both lilypond and context. In my last project (thanks to which I substantially started using both in a decent way) I included in metafun code 250 PDFs fragments made by lily. Perfect result. So, I was asking myself: is lily direct inclusion in context so relevant? Why? Just for my curiosity. -a- On 15 Sep 2005, at 16:34, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am 2005-09-15 um 11:49 schrieb Christopher Creutzig:
especially Hraban, who had asked for sth like this,
Thank you for your work, I can't participate at the moment, am just too busy.
Perhaps document what you did and what's missing at the wiki page: http://wiki.contextgarden.net/LilyPond
Grüßlis vom Hraban! --- http://www.fiee.net/texnique/ http://contextgarden.net http://www.cacert.org (I'm an assurer)
_______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Andrea Valle Laboratorio multimediale "G. Quazza" Facoltà di Scienze della Formazione Università degli Studi di Torino andrea.valle@unito.it