[reshufling the order a bit] First of all - I forgot to express my positive surprise - all the horizontal breaks including hyphenation are *exactly the same* in MKII and MKIV all over the document, even though MKII and MKIV are using different fonts. Which is really nice. \startyoumayignorethis The only thing that really bothers me are so much different vertical differences which show up in almost every document I ever write. MKIV consistently takes more vertical space, so no matter what document I try to recompile, it always ends up with more pages (and some weird page breaks) when processing it with MKIV. Yes, I know. The two are incompatible. Yes, I know. Different fonts are being used. Yes, I know. Different algorithms/aproaches to break pages. But it would be soooooo nice if the most basic documents with LM fonts could turn out at least approximately the same. Horizontal breaking works perfectly (it's identical). It's only vertical spacing that's a tiny bit "problematic" and makes every recompiled document a bit messy. It might be nice to look a bit closer to the topic, like in the example that I pointed out. There are some weirdnesses left, like the equations that starts at least a line lower in MKIV when there's no real reason for such a behaviour. \stopyoumayignorethis
\definedescription [latexdesc] [headstyle={\ss\bf},style=normal,align=left,location=hanging,width=fit,margin=0cm]
just omit the align=left (was not handled in mkii)
Honestly, I have no idea why I had it there, but I guess that I was copy-pasting from wiki. So I didn't even notice that that option had no effect at all.
also, commands starting with \latex behave unpredictable in mkiv due to luigis compatibility mode
That was the best comment in the thread. Thanks for making me a day :)
\usetypescript[iwona] \setupbodyfont[iwona] \starttext $a+b$ \stoptext
hmm runs ok here ... but as i removed some old iwona stuff from type-otf
Thanks. In the new beta warnings are gone indeed. (I'll check the changes later.)
2.) Recently discussed on the mailing list - stopper has no influence in MKIV:
\setupcaptions[stopper={:}] \starttext \placefigure{title}{\framed{bla}} \stoptext
subtle difference:
\setupcaptions[numberstopper={:}] \starttext \placefigure{title}{\framed{bla}} \stoptext
all stopper, separator etc things are now more explicit as we have more control
Thanks a lot. (Just wandering - should stopper be a synonym for numberstopper in MKIV then or is stopper also used somewhere else?)
4.) A slightly more basic example:
\enableregime[utf-8] \starttext \startbuffer[gnu] \startMPcode draw \sometxt{čšž}; \stopMPcode \stopbuffer čšž \getbuffer[gnu] \stoptext
hm, i get a pdf file with
čšž čšž
so what happens at your end?
Did you try to run that with MKII? MKIV works fine (I know that the title was a bit misleading). I get the characters from font that are equal to the second byte of UTF-8 representation of input character.
5.) weird indeed, must be something basis as $$111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111\normalreqno{!!}$$
also has it .. taco just confirmed that it must be something in luatex itself
Thanks. I'm sorry that I didn't simplify that one (I just took a random equation out of a document since it looked nicer).
6.) I know that \NR is not the most appropriate way to go into next row, but the following gives considerably different results in MKII and MKIV:
\starttable[|l|] \NC \type{a} \NC\NR \NC \type{a} \NC\NR \NC \type{a} \NC\NR \stoptable
probably because \type has no strut in mkiv ... maybe it should have
I don't know.
9.) Note the big difference of when the formula starts vertically on page:
\starttext \startformula a+b \stopformula \stoptext
interesting, i need to look into that
Thanks :)
11.) Missing bibliography entries:
\usemodule[bib] % this line spoils the show \setuppublications[alternative=num]
\setuppublicationlayout[webpage]{% \inserttitle{\bgroup\it }{\egroup. }{}% \inserturl{}{}{}% }
\startpublication [k=FAIR,t=webpage,u=http://www.gsi.de/fair/] \biburl{http://www.gsi.de/fair/} \title{FAIR -- Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research} \stoppublication
\starttext \cite[FAIR]\par \placepublications \stoptext
magic to me, but we can look into bib mess stuff later
What can I do?
3.) Bibliography citations give different result with the same setup (different numbers and different spacing in \placepublication - might be also worth testing with grid typesetting as I wasn't able to set up the alignment properly in MKII last time when I have tried). I'm not sure which one is right, but there's probably no reason to produce different results.
\usemodule [bib] \setuppublications [alternative=num, criterium=all, sorttype=cite]
\starttext \startpublication[k=a,t=article]\arttitle{a}\stoppublication \startpublication[k=b,t=article]\arttitle{b}\stoppublication \startpublication[k=c,t=article]\arttitle{c}\stoppublication
x\cite[a,b,c]
\placepublications \stoptext
as i never used citations i don't know what you expect ... best ask Thomas what you should expect ... anyway, i'll make a template for the xml approach
Does anyone else have an idea of whether \cite[a,b,c] should generate [1,2,3] or [1-3]? I have an article at hand that has "[1], [2], [3]" instead to be honest. I'm not sure, but [1-3] somehow doesn't appear right to me. I have a feeling that each bib item needs to be cited separately, but I may be wrong. Mojca