![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/c5ae4f9aa0d3a9bd5376e92b322c3e50.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Tue, 15 Aug 2006, Boris Tschirschwitz wrote:
Let's say I have the following project structure
project.tex env.tex product1.tex component1.tex component2.tex product2.tex
Here, really, the whole project generates a single pdf at the end.
Now, when working on component1, I would run $ texmfstart texexec project.tex
Should I rather run texexec on product1.tex or component1.tex? Or maybe use texmfstart in some other way?
You should run texexec on prouct or component (not on the project)
I am wondering about this because 1. Perter says
Only components and products should be compiled.
2. When compiling projects that include MPgraphics, I have to run that texmfstart line above twice to see changes to MPgraphics in my pdf. I thought
Suppose you are typesetting a collection of books. Then project.tex should have common setup for all the books. product1.tex can be first book, product2.tex can be second book etc. component1.tex can be first chapter of the first book, etc. So, you are not supposed to compile the complete project. that one
idea behind texexec is that it takes care of all incantations, like "make" in programming.
This should not happen. Aditya
On 8/14/06, Peter Münster
wrote: On Sat, 12 Aug 2006, Derek Schmidt wrote:
The .tuo file for the _product_ file shows the files being loaded. Compiling the _project_ file yields no .tuo. My product file does indeed look like what you wrote.
Hello Derek, it's not intended to compile the project file. It should contain only common setups for all products. Only components and products should be compiled. Cheers, Peter
-- http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/ _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
-- Aditya Mahajan, EECS Systems, University of Michigan http://www.eecs.umich.edu/~adityam || Ph: 7342624008