On 5/2/21 12:20 AM, Adam Reviczky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I cannot get the signature working either, but almost certain it did
> work in February this year, as I have done some with MKIV.
> [...]
Hi Adam,
I’m on a Linux computer, so I’m not able to check this now.
If the signature isn’t working, you mean that the output PDF document
from fields-007.tex cannot be signed with Acrobat DC, don’t you?
Sorry for asking the obvious question, but this worked perfectly fine
each time I tested.
> Using the https://live.contextgarden.net/ with (LuaTeX 2.06 20200630 +
> ConTeXt MkIV 2020.06.30 17:30) looks good, but evince does not display
> the field.
Evince never displays the signature field, only when signed.
BTW, using mupdf-gl to sign the PDF document will mess it, since it has
problems to recognize the child object.
>From my experience, only Acrobat deals with child objects in signatures
generating a valid signature (and rewriting the two objects into a
single one).
Just in case it might help,
Pablo
--
http://www.ousia.tk
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________