On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 02:31:04PM +0200, Piotr Kopszak wrote:
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 11:03:53PM +0200, Patrick Gundlach wrote: [...]
I just looked at the webpage you mentioned and TeXML resources. If I'm not mistaken it seems it was conceived for LaTeX. Does it really make sense in context of ConTeXt? I'm afraid having a language whose available reference does not even mention ConTeXt only adds up to the existing TeX mess rather than makes it richer. At least the subset which makes use of ConTeXt should be called differently. Sorry for my ignorance. These are just first impressions after having a quick look at the idea.
It is true that originally this was designed just for LaTeX. But I became a developer and changed the code so that it will work under ConTeXt. I even provided a script that will convert TeXML directly from XML to PDF or other print formats. The name of this script is texml_con. It is only available on CVS right now, but I should make it available as a package sometime later today. I will have to aske the administrator of the sourceforge site to update the webpage so that it mentions ConTeXt as well. I provide myriads of examples on the webpages in TeXML format. Running the TeXML script on any of these codes will change the documents to valid ConTeXt. Paul -- ************************ *Paul Tremblay * *phthenry@iglou.com * ************************