Re: [NTG-context] What do you miss in ConTeXt?

On 14-3-2010 22:06, Vedran Miletić wrote:

Datuma 8. ožujka 2010. 15:36 Mojca Miklavec je napisao/la:

...

...

does

\PDFunicodetrue

help

No. (I remember there were some threads about that in past though, but I don't remember the outcome.)

Mojca

It doesn't change anything.

By the way, XeTeX also breaks, but in a different way. "Računalne mreže" becomes "RaÄ“unalne mreže". Same option also doesn't do anything.

MkIV works nicely, and I know I should probably be using that, but LaTeX with hyperref can do unicode bookmarks in both XeTeX and pdfTeX, so it would be really cool if ConTeXt would be able to do it as well.

Hm, i wonder what goes wrong, so can you make a test file? I was under the impression that context could do it before latex if only because it was used to test the <> entries when that feature was added to pdftex so maybe soemthing got lost (it might also be that some ecodings work better than others, so let's assume utf) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------