On 2 Nov 2014, at 12:00 , Pablo Rodriguez
I have the following sample:
\setuppapersize[A6] \starttext \index{tipografía digital} \index{tipografías} \index{tomato white} \index{tomatoes red} \index{idioma+de un pasaje} \index{idioma+del documento} \completeindex \stoptext
Latest beta from 2014.10.31 12:47 sorts the index entries the following way:
tomatoes red tomato white
Of course, this sample doesn’t make sense, but the entries in Spanish do. All of them are wrong sorted.
Stable version from 2014.01.03 00:40. The different sorting criterium seems to have been introduced in beta from 2014.10.22 16:23.
Or shouldn’t be the first word sorted first and then the second one in index entry?
Could anyone be so kind to confirm the bug?
Many thanks for your help,
Pablo
Hi Pablo, I cannot confirm any bug, but what I would do anyway is to force the sorting in whatever order I want by using \index[]{} with the argument specifying the order. So your example could be: \starttext \index[tipograf\'{i}adig]{tipograf\'{i}a digital} \index[tipograf\'{i}as]{tipograf\'{i}as} \index[idiomadeu]{idioma+de un pasaje} \index[idiomadel]{idioma+del documento} \completeindex \stoptext if you want tipografias digital before tipografias. This works with all mkiv and mkii versions I have, including the ones that I installed today. I use it for a rather comlex three-level index and it works flawlessly (for me). Best regards, Robert Blackstone