Re: [NTG-context] Basic TeX question, how to redefine ^^M

23 Apr 2007


      On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Zhichu Chen wrote:
...
Hi, Aditya
I've made another definition, the output is OK, with some errors. Can you
tell me what's wrong?
Here is a more robust solution

\everypar{%
\let\normalpar\par%
\let\par\donothing%
\page[yes]%
\let\par\normalpar}

or

\everypar{%
\begingroup
\let\par\donothing%
\page[yes]%
\endgroup}

or

\everypar{%
\bgroup
\let\par\donothing%
\page[yes]%
\egroup}

Aditya

Re: [NTG-context] Basic TeX question, how to redefine ^^M

Aditya Mahajan