Dnia Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 11:02:13PM +0100, Wolfgang Schuster napisał(a):
Am 04.11.2008 um 22:51 schrieb Marcin Borkowski:
Dnia Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:06:13PM +0100, Arthur Reutenauer napisał(a):
Thank you for your prompt answers. I am a bit surprised, though, that the otf and Type1 Latin Modern fonts are not compatible. Strange thing.
You should come to BachoTeX. In 2007 Jerzy Ludwichowski and Bogusław Jackowski started their talk about TeX Gyre by screaming "Full compatibility means no progress!" at the audience :-)
I know that, I read some of the GUST people papers;). I thought, however, that it wouldn't influence my documents *so much*;).
LuaTeX did not always behave like pdfTeX and if you want the same result in your document as in the past, don't switch. The different code for MkII and MkIV are another reason for different output in a few cases.
Well, since I'm really a beginner, I don't have much ConTeXt documents. So I guess the sooner I switch, the better - especially that MkIV is better for my itemizations;).
Wolfgang
Greets -- Marcin Borkowski (http://mbork.pl) 888 * Nie lękaj się * Ja zawsze będę z Tobą!