![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/2b1965851d1faf8215b2af801f63bafb.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
30 Oct
2012
30 Oct
'12
3:33 p.m.
On 10/30/2012 01:39 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
sure, till one replaces bash by something non-bash-ish while the user still thinks he's running bash (i always fear the moment that someone decides that swapping the 'cp' arguments without renaming the command is a good idea -)
(i wouldn't be surprised if it can backfire badly in more complex situations)
Hans
My background is in "commercial" Unix and I've had situations like having to administer an HP box (HPUX) a Sun box (Solaris) a Teradata box (some flavor or other of SYS V R4) some BSD and Linux on the same day. :) Only thing I could count on was the "official" AT&T Bourne shell syntax. I use ksh93 (the AT&T distribution) as my login shell. -- Bill Meahan Westland, Michigan USA