Re: [NTG-context] Table width trouble

nico wrote:

On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 18:28:20 +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:

...

nico wrote:

...

Hello,

I come back with that damn table test case. With release 2006.04.22: [...]

\long\def\dohandleTBLcellA#1#2[#3]#4%

Thanks, it does it. Another torture case: when column widths are partially defined, it can give a weird result (here the last column has almost disppeared). Since it's a limit case, I don't know if it's worth being fixed.

\bTABLE[frame=on] \setupTABLE[c][2][width=3em] \setupTABLE[c][3][width=3em] \bTR \bTD[nc=2] A \eTD\bTD x \eTD \bTD[nc=2] B \eTD \eTR \bTR \bTD X \eTD \bTD[nc=3] C \eTD \bTD x \eTD \eTR \bTR \bTD[nc=2] D \eTD \bTD x \eTD \bTD[nc=2] E \eTD \eTR \eTABLE

indeed a strange case the best is to collect them so that i can look into them some rainy day (btw, if users have interesting example tables that demo something not in ennatab, then we can add them there) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------