Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 15:23, Hans Hagen wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
and has no influence in mkiv. (The workaround in mkii is to use \theta instead of θ, in mkiv it makes no difference.) in mkiv (unicode) we need complete bold fonts .. (or make additional vectors); bold alphabets are part of math in unicode and should work ok but symbols is a 'whole font' issue
I agree ... there are lots of other symbols.
I noticed the "tex-bi" in math-vfu (I'm still looking into beta version). There's no mapping for it, but I guess that it's probably exactly the same as "math-bi".
Do you plan to misuse "tex-bi" or to to define mathematics.make_font ( "lmroman10-boldmath" ... ) for bold math then?
currently only math tf is defined (fam 0) and we will also have math bf (fam 1); mostly a matter of definitions but i was not in the mood to figure out all the bold fonts involved/needed Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------