A book is not at all a repository of code or a reference.
It can be foundational, and in that case you'll just keep on reading for many years.
(the TeX Book)

A serious update and expansion of the manual would be enough.

Best

-a-


On 9 Apr 2008, at 09:06, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
2008/4/9, Gour <gour@mail.inet.hr>:
 Andrea> Always asked for.  But nobody raise a hand...:-)
 Andrea> I would read it eagerly
 I would even buy it ;)

I wouldn't - I've a shelf full of development books but always only
use online docs. In this area books simply are too slow.

Greetlings, Hraban
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

--------------------------------------------------
Andrea Valle
--------------------------------------------------
CIRMA - DAMS
Universitą degli Studi di Torino
--------------------------------------------------


"
Think of it as seasoning
. noise [salt] is boring
. F(blah) [food without salt] can be boring
. F(noise, blah) can be really tasty
"
(Ken Perlin on noise)