Hi Hans, as there was no answer at all on the list, does that mean that the idea of \footnote[-] was deleted without replacement? Steffen Am 03.11.2011 um 10:42 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
Sure, one can use a construct like this ...
\starttext
\chapter{a}
\section{b}
\start \definestructureconversionset[footnote][empty] \setupenumerations[footnote][numberconversionset=footnote,numberseparatorset=footnote] test\footnote{only this} text \stop
\stoptext
... but a short command like \footnote[-]{...} would be more handy in practice.
Is there no successor for \footnote[-]{...} in MkIV?
Steffen
Am 02.11.2011 um 11:37 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
Hi,
does anyone know how to get an "empty" footnote marker (see example below), as it was achieved in MkII with "[-]"?
Steffen
-------
\starttext
\chapter{a}
\section{b}
test\footnote[-]{only this} text
\stoptext
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________