It's true. In the version that comes with TeXlive 2021 (2021.03.05)
this numbering works fine, but not with the 2022.05.11.
L. Montgomery
El jue, 19 may 2022 a las 3:34, śrīrāma via ntg-context (
Hi,
[I am on version 2022.05.11 11:36]
I think either a bug might have crept into one of the recent uploads or there is some change in behaviour – numbering of statements inside mathalignment blocks is not working: only one statement is numbered even if multiple are requested.
The following example does not produce the expected result (sample attached): both the equations should be numbered when only the first one is –
\starttext
\placeformula \startformula \startmathalignment \NC a \NC = b \NR[eq:one] \NC c \NC = d \NR[eq:two] \stopmathalignment \stopformula
\stoptext
Also the [+] options and the second optional argument of \NR does not work as expected. Has its behaviour changed?
I ran into this when I compiled a large maths-heavy document and while proof- reading noticed numerous missing references to statements inside mathalignment. Please advise me on how I might fix/workaround this.
Thank you,
Sreeram___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________