![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/b79687264c3e06cba13b54d05b12a9f5.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hi Alan, you should at least limit the scope of the command to math mode \appendtoks \let\t\mathtext \let\w\mathword \to \everymathematics Wolfgang
Alan Braslau mailto:braslau.list@comcast.net 8. Juli 2018 um 23:11 In many "less-rigorous" uses of equations, there is an abundant need to include words (text) in mathematics, and using \mathtext{} or \mbox{} or whatever is unwieldy.
Readable subscripts, self-explanatory variable names, etc. might be text and not symbols. These situations can be very common. This is why I asked (1) what is the right method, and (2) what do others think about the shorthand \t{}, similar to the shorthand \m{}?
Alan
On Sun, 8 Jul 2018 23:00:00 +0200
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________