On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 19:57, Hans Hagen
On 27-9-2011 19:52, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 19:44, Hans Hagen wrote:
there is some fall back mechanism that does that but as soon as one defined his/her own typescript that can interfere
How should we define trypescripts to avoid interference then?
A typeface definition normally has a matching monospace and math definition (so: ss + tt + mm or rm + tt + mm or in some cases rm + ss + tt + mm). Of course some relative scaling has to be considered then.
Do you want to say that we need an explicit definition of LM Math? Just curious: how much information is missing/how much would would it be if we would want to create a virtual math font by combining LM + populating italic/bold/bold italic latin and greek math alphabets from text font? Would that look horrible because of lack of information about glyph metrics? Mojca