-----Original Message----- From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl [mailto:ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl] On Behalf Of Peter Münster Sent: den 24 juli 2004 19:45
Hello Mats, I agree with you: ConTeXt is certainly superior to LaTeX, but sometimes, I know how to do a special thing in LaTeX, but not in ConTeXt. Often I don't know, if a special feature is already there but undocumented, or not. Sometimes, I find a sort of "workaround" to get some LaTeX behaviour, for example "\flushbottom". For beginners there is the document http://www.berenddeboer.net/tex/LaTeX2ConTeXt.> pdf by Berend de Boer. It would be nice, to have something like this for advanced topics, such as varioref or lettrine. These special "LaTeX to ConTeXt" examples can then be added to the ConTeXt-wiki: http://contextgarden.net/From_LaTeX_to_ConTeXt Cheers, Peter
Thanks for the info. Having looked more closely at this, I guess it now stands between learning LaTeX and the memoir class, or learning ConTeXt. There are things that talk in favour for both these roadmaps, but I have not decided yet. One of the issues is how to solve a problem in ConTeXt if it suddenly becomes clear this or that feature is not implemented. Best regards, Mats Broberg