Now it works! Thank you so much, Wolfgang! Jairo :) El lun., 6 de jul. de 2020 a la(s) 13:48, Wolfgang Schuster ( wolfgang.schuster.lists@gmail.com) escribió:
Pablo Rodriguez schrieb am 06.07.2020 um 20:04:
On 7/6/20 3:58 PM, Jairo A. del Rio wrote:
So, cannot I use focus=standard and cross-references together? Hmm. I think it should be fixed... But maybe it's an intended feature. Thanks, Otared.
Hi Jairo,
"focus=standard" works fine with footnotes.
\setupinteraction[state=start,focus=standard,color=,contrastcolor=] \defineenumeration[proposition][referenceprefix=prop] \starttext \startproposition[1] \input ward\footnote{Only a footnote} \stopproposition \in[prop:1] \stoptext
Your sample doesn’t work, because of the reference prefix. Right now, the /Names reads in the PDF code:
/Names [ (1) 5 0 R ]
It seems that "referenceprefix" is forgotten there, which should read with the sample code from above:
/Names [ (prop:1) 5 0 R ]
Hans, could you check this? (I’m afraid it doesn’t work with current latest [2020.07.06 19:30])?
I'm not Hans but this fixed the problem for me (strc-con.mkiv):
\def\strc_constructions_register_yes[#1][#2]% #1=optional user data #2=interfaced-settings {\begingroup % similar to structure so we might generalize this ... \clf_setinternalreference - prefix {\referenceprefix}% + prefix {\currentconstructionreferenceprefix}% reference {\currentconstructionreference}% internal \locationcount view {\interactionparameter\c!focus}% \relax ... \fi}
Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________