![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/49e63acb01f2ca80efce7eed08310ce8.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 15:33, Yue Wang wrote:
I see, no font is defined when dumping the formats... pretty unlike plain TeX... then why so much time is used for iwona, while only 1.2 sec is used to load lm roman?
I have a bit of a problem to test all that since running fc-cache only takes two seconds.
here fc-cache takes minutes
A run with iwona takes 2.1 seconds (2.4 when some math equations are added) and a run with LM takes 1.1 seconds. The timings refer to subsequent runs, not to the first run.
lm is faster because the definitions are preloaded (not the fonts themselves but the typescript defs)
Maybe I should try to experiment on Windows. I have no idea when XeTeX forces reload of fc-cache, but I suspect that any other application does the same if font database becomes outdated. I didn't notice subsequent runs of fc-cache though. Once fc-cache is through, it doesn't run for a while.
here it runs *each* xetex run ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------