Re: [NTG-context] closesymbol on same line as displayed formula

20 Mar 2017

      On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 7:23 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist  wrote:
...
Hi,
I'm bringing up an old question on placing the qedsymbol, or
closesymbol as it is also called. This was previously discussed in
https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2014/079807.html and the
purpose of this post is to ask if there is any solution to the problem
now. Looking at the file below (output is attached), when the proof
ends with a displayed formula, the closesymbol is located one row
down. I want it to be (flushright) on the same line as the displayed
formula.
If I use \placeclosesymbol the closesymbol is indeed put on the
correct line, but not flushright.
Any ideas? I'm willing to use some command like \placeclosesymbol in
the occations when the proof ends with a displayed formula.
/Mikael
\defineenumeration[proof][
number=no,
text=Proof,
headstyle={\it},
alternative=serried,
width=fit,
closesymbol={$\square$},
]
\starttext
\startproof
This is a short proof.
\stopproof
\startproof
This is another short proof, ending with the formula
\startformula
1+1=2.
\stopformula
\stopproof
\startproof
This is another short proof, ending with the formula
\startformula
1+1=2.\placeclosesymbol
\stopformula
\stopproof
\startproof
This is a rather advanced proof, ending with formulas
\startformula
\startalign
\NC 1+1 \NC = 2,\NR
\NC 2+2 \NC = 4.\NR
\stopalign
\stopformula
\stopproof
\startproof
This is a rather advanced proof, ending with formulas
\startformula
\startalign
\NC 1+1 \NC = 2,\NR
\NC 2+2 \NC = 4.\placeclosesymbol\NR
\stopalign
\stopformula
\stopproof
\stoptext
Partly shameful bump.

Is it even possible? (It is using LaTeX and the \qedhere command)

Could I provide more information?

/Mikael