Re: [NTG-context] \startchemical

On 8/18/2015 8:01 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:

On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 19:42:20 +0200 Wolfgang Schuster wrote:

...

why does \startchemical take the name of a instance as argument (e.g. \startchemical[important]) when there is no way to create it because \definechemical is redefined and the original version isn’t saved.

Even \setupchemical[important][..,..=..,..] can’t be used because it doesn’t resolve the parent setting.

I did not realize that \startchemical took the name of an instance as argument - I have only used it with key=value, i.e.: \startchemical[...=...]

I suppose that it uses some "standard" mechanisms.

\definechemical[benzene] is different. It gets used as:

\startchemical \chemical[benzene,...] \stopchemical

Perhaps there is some inconsistency with respect to ConTeXt syntax here.

the issue is that we have definechemical doing something different (compatibility) but we can do this: in chem-str.mkiv: % \installsimplecommandhandler \??chemical {chemical} \??chemical % no \define... \installcommandhandler \??chemical {chemical} \??chemical % no \define... \let\setupchemicals \setupchemical \let\definechemicals\definechemical then we can do: \starttext \definechemicals[foo][axis=on] \startchemical[foo] \chemical[SIX,ROT2,B,R6,SUB1,FIVE,ROT1,B][1] \stopchemical \stoptext ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------