� wrote:
I understand and accept your arguments. Even for me, it's no more problem to add here and there a \dontleavehmode, since I know it now. But for a beginner and a user without ambition to become a ConTeXt expert, the actual behaviour is annoying. He just sees a line break, where he does not expect it. There is a fundamental difference between bla \framed{bla} bla and \framed{bla} bla bla that is not understandable.
this is the case for many more things and a tex speciality which takes while to get accustomed to; a similar case is {\bf whatever} rest of par best put a \dontleavevmode or \strut in front if you want indentation and related features to work
Perhaps one day, I would like to convert some of my colleagues from M$-Word to ConTeXt, but if I have to teach them about things like \dontleavehmode there is no need for further efforts. So, such a switch would be very welcome (I would put it into cont-sys.tex)!
but then it would break other things and your collegues would scream about that btw, there is \inframed for inline usage, or one could define a symbol Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------