Quoting from the thread "Adaptive section structuring" of September 2012:
%\definesectionlevels[default][section,subsection,subsubsection] \definesectionlevels[mine][title,subject,subsubject]
\starttext
\startsectionlevel [title=Alpha] \startsectionlevel [title=Beta] \startsectionlevel [title=Gamma] \stopsectionlevel \stopsectionlevel \stopsectionlevel
\startsectionlevel [mine] [title=One] \startsectionlevel [mine] [title=Two] \startsectionlevel [mine] [title=Three] \stopsectionlevel \stopsectionlevel \stopsectionlevel
\stoptext
Wolfgang
Alan
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 09:42:19 +0200
Alan BRASLAU
Hello,
Structure (sectioning) is a question of hierarchical level, there is nothing special about the names "part" or "chapter" except setups that reflect common usage.
I place Prologue and Epilogue at the "part" level. Better yet, I situate them in "frontmatter" and "backmatter". Maybe my use is incorrect but this is how I understand things.
There is a mechanism for automatic section level which is very nice. Hans describes this in: "levels-001.tex and levels-002.tex in the test suite to see how to use relative sectioning."
Alan
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 13:49:36 +0200 Michał Goliński
wrote: Given a file:
\setupinteraction[state=start] \placebookmarks[part,chapter][part,chapter]
\starttext
\startchapter[title=Prologue, number=no] \input knuth \stopchapter
\startpart[title={Part A}] \startchapter[title=One] \input knuth \stopchapter \stoppart
\startchapter[title=Epilogue] \input knuth \stopchapter
\stoptext
I would expect to have the logical structure of titles as follows:
+ Prologue + Part A - + One + Epilogue
i.e., "Epilogue" should be at the highest level, as "Prologue" is. Context gives me an Epilogue that is a child of "Part A".
Is it possible to have the chapter "Epilogue" not be a child of "Part A"?
Best regards Michał Goliński
-- Alan Braslau CEA DSM-IRAMIS-SPEC CNRS URA 2464 Orme des Merisiers 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette cedex FRANCE tel: +33 1 69 08 73 15 fax: +33 1 69 08 87 86 mailto:alan.braslau@cea.fr