Simon Pepping (spepping@scaprea.hobby.nl) wrote:
Good to hear you put it to good use.
Yes, I'm at the beginning still exploring the paths of possible customizations, and therefore I'll try not to ask stupid questions (as before) before doing my homework :-) The possibility to author DocBook documents and get TeX quality output with the coherent package like ConTeXt looks worth some learning curve.
As was discussed some time ago the mapping of Unicode characters in ConTeXt requires more work. The default encoding uses a simple compatibility:
enco-def.tex: \definecharacter Dstroke {D} \definecharacter dstroke {d}
Thank you for your pointer for further "research". I've found that enco-mis.tex handles this D&dstroke mechanism since they are resolved as \DJ & \dj commands, but I don't have any idea whether it can be used somehow to solve my problem. Any hint? Sincerely, Gour
I think it would be a good idea to try to use Sebastian Rahtz's mappings for LaTeX (texmf/tex/xmltex/passivetex/ucharacters.sty) in ConTeXt as well.
Yes, it looks nice. I hope that by improving Unicode mappings, the need for handling different encodings will be reduced, at least. Sincerely, Gour -- Gour gour@mail.inet.hr Registered Linux User #278493